Need help choosing the right code?
Ask CasePilot about procedures, modifiers, bundling, and coding guidance.
Try CasePilot© Copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Nasal function studies, including procedures such as rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry, are diagnostic tests designed to evaluate the functionality of the nasal passages. Rhinomanometry specifically measures the air pressure and the rate of airflow within the nasal airway during the process of respiration. By obtaining these measurements, healthcare professionals can calculate nasal airway resistance, which is a critical factor in assessing the patency of the nasal airway and determining the extent of any obstruction present. On the other hand, acoustic rhinometry serves a different purpose; it assesses the anatomical configuration of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx. This technique utilizes sound waves that are emitted into the nasal passages, which then reflect off the surfaces within the nasal cavities. The reflected sound waves are analyzed to provide insights into the presence and degree of nasal obstruction. Together, these studies play a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to nasal airflow and obstruction, guiding treatment decisions, and improving patient outcomes.
© Copyright 2026 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.
The following conditions or symptoms may warrant the performance of nasal function studies, such as rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry:
The procedure for conducting nasal function studies involves several key steps, which are detailed below:
After the completion of nasal function studies, patients may be monitored briefly to ensure they are comfortable and to discuss the findings. There are typically no significant recovery requirements, as these studies are non-invasive and do not involve sedation. Patients may resume normal activities immediately following the procedure. The results of the studies will be compiled and analyzed, with a report generated for the referring physician to review. This report will assist in determining the appropriate management plan based on the findings of nasal airway resistance and configuration.
| Short Descr | NASAL FUNCTION STUDIES | Medium Descr | NASAL FUNCTION STUDIES | Long Descr | Nasal function studies (eg, rhinomanometry) | Status Code | Active Code | Global Days | XXX - Global Concept Does Not Apply | PC/TC Indicator (26, TC) | 0 - Physician Service Code | Multiple Procedures (51) | 0 - No payment adjustment rules for multiple procedures apply. | Bilateral Surgery (50) | 0 - 150% payment adjustment for bilateral procedures does NOT apply. | Physician Supervisions | 09 - Concept does not apply. | Assistant Surgeon (80, 82) | 0 - Payment restriction for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure... | Co-Surgeons (62) | 0 - Co-surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Team Surgery (66) | 0 - Team surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Diagnostic Imaging Family | 99 - Concept Does Not Apply | APC Status Indicator | Procedure or Service, Not Discounted when Multiple | Type of Service (TOS) | 1 - Medical Care | Berenson-Eggers TOS (BETOS) | T2D - Other tests - other | MUE | 1 | CCS Clinical Classification | 31 - Diagnostic procedures on nose, mouth and pharynx |
| 59 | Distinct procedural service: under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-e/m services performed on the same day. modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than e/m services, that are not normally reported together, but are appropriate under the circumstances. documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. however, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. note: modifier 59 should not be appended to an e/m service. to report a separate and distinct e/m service with a non-e/m service performed on the same date, see modifier 25. | 25 | Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional on the same day of the procedure or other service: it may be necessary to indicate that on the day a procedure or service identified by a cpt code was performed, the patient's condition required a significant, separately identifiable e/m service above and beyond the other service provided or beyond the usual preoperative and postoperative care associated with the procedure that was performed. a significant, separately identifiable e/m service is defined or substantiated by documentation that satisfies the relevant criteria for the respective e/m service to be reported (see evaluation and management services guidelines for instructions on determining level of e/m service). the e/m service may be prompted by the symptom or condition for which the procedure and/or service was provided. as such, different diagnoses are not required for reporting of the e/m services on the same date. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 25 to the appropriate level of e/m service. note: this modifier is not used to report an e/m service that resulted in a decision to perform surgery. see modifier 57 for significant, separately identifiable non-e/m services, see modifier 59. |
|
Date
|
Action
|
Notes
|
|---|---|---|
| Pre-1990 | Added | Code added. |
Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.