Coding Ahead
CasePilot
Medical Coding Assistant
CaseConsultant
Instant Email Coding Consultant
Case2Code
Search and Code Lookup Tool
CareerCenter
Medical Coding Job Board
Log in Register free account

Need help choosing the right code?

Ask CasePilot about procedures, modifiers, bundling, and coding guidance.

Try CasePilot

Official Description

Evaluation of auditory function for surgically implanted device(s) candidacy or postoperative status of a surgically implanted device(s); first hour

© Copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Common Language Description

The evaluation of auditory function for surgically implanted device candidacy or postoperative status is a critical process that assesses whether a patient qualifies for devices such as cochlear implants. This evaluation is particularly important for individuals with significant hearing disabilities who may not benefit from traditional hearing aids. The procedure begins with a comprehensive case history that includes an assessment of the patient's hearing loss, any recent changes in their ability to understand speech, and any family history of hearing loss. Additionally, the provider evaluates the current use of hearing aids, checking their functional integrity and determining the effectiveness of any adjustments made to optimize the hearing amplification system.

During the evaluation, the patient is placed in a controlled sound booth, which is equipped with loudspeakers positioned at specific angles to create a spherical coordinate system. This setup allows for precise control over the sound presentation and intensity levels. The assessment involves testing the patient's ability to perceive speech and understand both words and sentences in a quiet environment, with varying intensity levels from the loudspeakers. The testing is further complicated by introducing different levels of background noise to simulate real-world listening conditions. Each ear is tested separately with the amplification device, and then both ears are assessed together to evaluate binaural hearing performance. The results of these tests are scored and interpreted using standard performance measures, which help determine the potential success of an implant. Furthermore, similar evaluations may be conducted postoperatively to monitor auditory function after the surgical placement of the implant. For billing purposes, CPT® code 92626 is reported for the first hour of evaluation, while 92627 is used for each additional 15 minutes of service provided.

© Copyright 2026 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.

1. Indications

The evaluation of auditory function for surgically implanted device candidacy or postoperative status is indicated for patients who exhibit significant hearing loss and may benefit from surgical intervention. The following conditions may warrant this evaluation:

  • Hearing Disability Patients with a substantial reduction in their ability to understand speech, which may impact their daily communication and quality of life.
  • Familial Hearing Loss A history of hearing loss within the family that may suggest a genetic predisposition to auditory impairment.
  • Current Hearing Aid Use Individuals who are currently using hearing aids but are experiencing limited benefits or improvement in their hearing capabilities.
  • Functional Integrity of Hearing Aids Assessment of the effectiveness and functionality of existing hearing aids, including any adjustments made to optimize their performance.

2. Procedure

The procedure for evaluating auditory function involves several key steps to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the patient's hearing capabilities.

  • Step 1: Detailed Case History The provider begins by taking a thorough case history, which includes inquiries about the patient's hearing loss, recent changes in speech understanding, family history of hearing loss, and current use of hearing aids. This information is crucial for understanding the patient's auditory background and determining the appropriateness of surgical intervention.
  • Step 2: Controlled Sound Booth Testing The patient is then seated in a controlled sound booth designed to minimize external noise and distractions. Loudspeakers are strategically positioned at specific angles to create a spherical coordinate system, allowing for precise control over sound presentation and intensity levels during testing.
  • Step 3: Speech Perception Testing The patient's ability to perceive speech is assessed at various intensity levels. This includes testing word and sentence intelligibility in a quiet environment, followed by repeated assessments with varying levels of background noise to simulate real-world listening conditions.
  • Step 4: Binaural Testing Hearing performance is quantified for each ear separately while using the amplification device, followed by a binaural assessment to evaluate the combined hearing capabilities of both ears. This step is essential for understanding how well the patient can process sound in a more natural listening environment.
  • Step 5: Scoring and Interpretation The results from the auditory evaluations are scored and interpreted using standard performance measures. This analysis helps determine the potential usefulness of an implant and its likelihood of success for the patient.
  • Step 6: Postoperative Evaluation If the patient undergoes surgery for an implant, similar auditory function testing may be conducted postoperatively to assess the effectiveness of the device and the patient's auditory performance following the procedure.

3. Post-Procedure

After the evaluation procedure, the patient may receive recommendations based on the results of the auditory function tests. If a surgically implanted device is deemed appropriate, the patient will be informed about the next steps in the surgical process. Postoperatively, ongoing assessments may be necessary to monitor the patient's auditory function and the effectiveness of the implant. This may include follow-up appointments to adjust the device settings and ensure optimal performance. The overall recovery process and any additional considerations will be discussed with the patient to ensure they are well-informed and supported throughout their auditory rehabilitation journey.

Short Descr EVAL AUD FUNCJ 1ST HOUR
Medium Descr EVAL AUD FUNCJ CAND/PO SURG IMPLT DEV 1ST HR
Long Descr Evaluation of auditory function for surgically implanted device(s) candidacy or postoperative status of a surgically implanted device(s); first hour
Status Code Active Code
Global Days XXX - Global Concept Does Not Apply
PC/TC Indicator (26, TC) 0 - Physician Service Code
Multiple Procedures (51) 0 - No payment adjustment rules for multiple procedures apply.
Bilateral Surgery (50) 2 - 150% payment adjustment does NOT apply.
Physician Supervisions 02 - Procedure must be performed under the direct supervision of a physician.
Assistant Surgeon (80, 82) 0 - Payment restriction for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure...
Co-Surgeons (62) 0 - Co-surgeons not permitted for this procedure.
Team Surgery (66) 0 - Team surgeons not permitted for this procedure.
Diagnostic Imaging Family 99 - Concept Does Not Apply
APC Status Indicator STV-Packaged Codes
Type of Service (TOS) 1 - Medical Care
Berenson-Eggers TOS (BETOS) T2D - Other tests - other
MUE 1
CCS Clinical Classification 25 - Diagnostic procedures on ear

This is a primary code that can be used with these additional add-on codes.

92627 Telehealth Service (Medicare) Addon Code MPFS Status: Active Code APC N Physician Quality Reporting PUB 100 CPT Assistant Article Evaluation of auditory function for surgically implanted device(s) candidacy or postoperative status of a surgically implanted device(s); each additional 15 minutes (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
59 Distinct procedural service: under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-e/m services performed on the same day. modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than e/m services, that are not normally reported together, but are appropriate under the circumstances. documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. however, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. note: modifier 59 should not be appended to an e/m service. to report a separate and distinct e/m service with a non-e/m service performed on the same date, see modifier 25.
XU Unusual non-overlapping service, the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service
AB Audiology service furnished personally by an audiologist without a physician/npp order for non-acute hearing assessment unrelated to disequilibrium, or hearing aids, or examinations for the purpose of prescribing, fitting, or changing hearing aids; service may be performed once every 12 months, per beneficiary
XS Separate structure, a service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure
GA Waiver of liability statement issued as required by payer policy, individual case
95 Synchronous telemedicine service rendered via a real-time interactive audio and video telecommunications system: synchronous telemedicine service is defined as a real-time interaction between a physician or other qualified health care professional and a patient who is located at a distant site from the physician or other qualified health care professional. the totality of the communication of information exchanged between the physician or other qualified health care professional and the patient during the course of the synchronous telemedicine service must be of an amount and nature that would be sufficient to meet the key components and/or requirements of the same service when rendered via a face-to-face interaction. modifier 95 may only be appended to the services listed in appendix p. appendix p is the list of cpt codes for services that are typically performed face-to-face, but may be rendered via a real-time (synchronous) interactive audio and video telecommunications system.
GN Services delivered under an outpatient speech language pathology plan of care
KX Requirements specified in the medical policy have been met
XE Separate encounter, a service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter
22 Increased procedural services: when the work required to provide a service is substantially greater than typically required, it may be identified by adding modifier 22 to the usual procedure code. documentation must support the substantial additional work and the reason for the additional work (ie, increased intensity, time, technical difficulty of procedure, severity of patient's condition, physical and mental effort required). note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service.
25 Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional on the same day of the procedure or other service: it may be necessary to indicate that on the day a procedure or service identified by a cpt code was performed, the patient's condition required a significant, separately identifiable e/m service above and beyond the other service provided or beyond the usual preoperative and postoperative care associated with the procedure that was performed. a significant, separately identifiable e/m service is defined or substantiated by documentation that satisfies the relevant criteria for the respective e/m service to be reported (see evaluation and management services guidelines for instructions on determining level of e/m service). the e/m service may be prompted by the symptom or condition for which the procedure and/or service was provided. as such, different diagnoses are not required for reporting of the e/m services on the same date. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 25 to the appropriate level of e/m service. note: this modifier is not used to report an e/m service that resulted in a decision to perform surgery. see modifier 57 for significant, separately identifiable non-e/m services, see modifier 59.
50 Bilateral procedure: unless otherwise identified in the listings, bilateral procedures that are performed at the same session, should be identified by adding modifier 50 to the appropriate 5 digit code. note: this modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see appendix d).
52 Reduced services: under certain circumstances a service or procedure is partially reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the physician or other qualified health care professional. under these circumstances the service provided can be identified by its usual procedure number and the addition of modifier 52, signifying that the service is reduced. this provides a means of reporting reduced services without disturbing the identification of the basic service. note: for hospital outpatient reporting of a previously scheduled procedure/service that is partially reduced or cancelled as a result of extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well-being of the patient prior to or after administration of anesthesia, see modifiers 73 and 74 (see modifiers approved for asc hospital outpatient use).
76 Repeat procedure or service by same physician or other qualified health care professional: it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was repeated by the same physician or other qualified health care professional subsequent to the original procedure or service. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 76 to the repeated procedure or service. note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service.
77 Repeat procedure by another physician or other qualified health care professional: it may be necessary to indicate that a basic procedure or service was repeated by another physician or other qualified health care professional subsequent to the original procedure or service. this circumstance may be reported by adding modifier 77 to the repeated procedure or service. note: this modifier should not be appended to an e/m service.
79 Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during the postoperative period: the individual may need to indicate that the performance of a procedure or service during the postoperative period was unrelated to the original procedure. this circumstance may be reported by using modifier 79. (for repeat procedures on the same day, see modifier 76.)
AG Primary physician
CC Procedure code change (use 'cc' when the procedure code submitted was changed either for administrative reasons or because an incorrect code was filed)
GC This service has been performed in part by a resident under the direction of a teaching physician
GP Services delivered under an outpatient physical therapy plan of care
GT Via interactive audio and video telecommunication systems
GV Attending physician not employed or paid under arrangement by the patient's hospice provider
GW Service not related to the hospice patient's terminal condition
GX Notice of liability issued, voluntary under payer policy
GY Item or service statutorily excluded, does not meet the definition of any medicare benefit or, for non-medicare insurers, is not a contract benefit
GZ Item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary
LT Left side (used to identify procedures performed on the left side of the body)
Q1 Routine clinical service provided in a clinical research study that is in an approved clinical research study
RT Right side (used to identify procedures performed on the right side of the body)
TG Complex/high tech level of care
Date
Action
Notes
2020-01-01 Changed Code description changed.
2006-01-01 Added First appearance in code book in 2006.
Code
Description
Code
Description
Code
Description
Code
Description
CasePilot

Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.

Ask about:
CPT Codes Guidelines Modifiers Crosswalks NCCI Edits Compliance Medicare Coverage
Example: "What is CPT code 99213?" or "Guidelines for E/M services"