Need help choosing the right code?
Ask CasePilot about procedures, modifiers, bundling, and coding guidance.
Try CasePilot© Copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
A central motor evoked potential (MEP) study is a diagnostic procedure that assesses the functionality of the motor pathways in the brain and their connection to the muscles in the upper limbs. This study involves the application of electrical stimulation to the motor area of the cerebral cortex, which is the region of the brain responsible for voluntary movement. The stimulation is followed by the recording of electrical activity from peripheral muscles, such as the biceps, triceps, abductor pollicis brevis, and abductor digiti minimi, located in the upper extremities. The primary goal of this procedure is to evaluate how well the motor pathways are functioning, which can provide valuable insights into various neurological conditions. Before conducting the MEP recording, baseline nerve conduction studies are performed to establish a reference point for comparison. During the procedure, electrodes are strategically placed on the skin over the targeted muscles, and their impedances are checked to ensure accurate readings. The optimal scalp location for stimulation is identified for each muscle tested, and the threshold for eliciting a motor response is determined. The stimulation of the motor cortex generates MEPs, which are then recorded and analyzed. Key measurements include the amplitude or strength of the response and the speed of the response, indicated by the onset latency, which are compared to the baseline nerve conduction study results. Additionally, the study involves testing the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) by stimulating the ulnar nerve for the abductor digiti minimi muscle. The strength of the MEP response is expressed as a percentage of the CMAP strength, and the central motor conduction time (CMCT) is calculated. The procedure also assesses the dissociation between excitatory and inhibitory effects of transcranial stimulation, which is crucial for understanding the motor pathway's integrity. The entire process is repeated for multiple muscles in both the ipsilateral and contralateral upper extremities, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of motor function. Finally, the physician reviews the collected data and generates a detailed report of the findings, which aids in diagnosing and managing neurological disorders.
© Copyright 2026 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.
The central motor evoked potential study (CPT® Code 95928) is indicated for the evaluation of motor pathway function in the upper extremities. This procedure is typically performed in the following scenarios:
The central motor evoked potential study involves several detailed procedural steps to ensure accurate assessment of motor pathway function:
After the completion of the central motor evoked potential study, the patient may be monitored briefly to ensure there are no immediate adverse effects from the stimulation. The physician will analyze the recorded data and compare it to the baseline nerve conduction studies to assess motor pathway integrity. The findings will be compiled into a detailed report, which will include the MEP amplitudes, onset latencies, CMAP results, and any observed dissociations between excitatory and inhibitory responses. This report is crucial for guiding further diagnostic or therapeutic interventions based on the patient's neurological status. Patients may resume normal activities following the procedure, but any specific post-procedure care or follow-up appointments will be determined by the physician based on the individual patient's needs and clinical context.
| Short Descr | C MOTOR EVOKED UPPR LIMBS | Medium Descr | CTR MOTOR EP STD TRANSCRNL MOTOR STIMJ UPR LIMBS | Long Descr | Central motor evoked potential study (transcranial motor stimulation); upper limbs | Status Code | Active Code | Global Days | XXX - Global Concept Does Not Apply | PC/TC Indicator (26, TC) | 1 - Diagnostic Tests for Radiology Services | Multiple Procedures (51) | 0 - No payment adjustment rules for multiple procedures apply. | Bilateral Surgery (50) | 2 - 150% payment adjustment does NOT apply. | Physician Supervisions | 09 - Concept does not apply. | Assistant Surgeon (80, 82) | 0 - Payment restriction for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure... | Co-Surgeons (62) | 0 - Co-surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Team Surgery (66) | 0 - Team surgeons not permitted for this procedure. | Diagnostic Imaging Family | 99 - Concept Does Not Apply | APC Status Indicator | Procedure or Service, Not Discounted when Multiple | Type of Service (TOS) | 1 - Medical Care | Berenson-Eggers TOS (BETOS) | T2D - Other tests - other | MUE | 1 | CCS Clinical Classification | 7 - Other diagnostic nervous system procedures |
This is a primary code that can be used with these additional add-on codes.
| 95940 | Addon Code Resequenced Code MPFS Status: Active Code APC N Continuous intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in the operating room, one on one monitoring requiring personal attendance, each 15 minutes (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) | 95941 | Addon Code Resequenced Code MPFS Status: Not valid for Medicare purposes APC N Continuous intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring, from outside the operating room (remote or nearby) or for monitoring of more than one case while in the operating room, per hour (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) | G0453 | Add-on Code Medicare Coverage: Carrier Priced MPFS Status: Active Code APC N Continuous intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring, from outside the operating room (remote or nearby), per patient, (attention directed exclusively to one patient) each 15 minutes (list in addition to primary procedure) |
| 26 | Professional component: certain procedures are a combination of a physician or other qualified health care professional component and a technical component. when the physician or other qualified health care professional component is reported separately, the service may be identified by adding modifier 26 to the usual procedure number. | GC | This service has been performed in part by a resident under the direction of a teaching physician | 52 | Reduced services: under certain circumstances a service or procedure is partially reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the physician or other qualified health care professional. under these circumstances the service provided can be identified by its usual procedure number and the addition of modifier 52, signifying that the service is reduced. this provides a means of reporting reduced services without disturbing the identification of the basic service. note: for hospital outpatient reporting of a previously scheduled procedure/service that is partially reduced or cancelled as a result of extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well-being of the patient prior to or after administration of anesthesia, see modifiers 73 and 74 (see modifiers approved for asc hospital outpatient use). | 59 | Distinct procedural service: under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-e/m services performed on the same day. modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than e/m services, that are not normally reported together, but are appropriate under the circumstances. documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. however, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. note: modifier 59 should not be appended to an e/m service. to report a separate and distinct e/m service with a non-e/m service performed on the same date, see modifier 25. | GZ | Item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary | RT | Right side (used to identify procedures performed on the right side of the body) | SG | Ambulatory surgical center (asc) facility service | XU | Unusual non-overlapping service, the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service |
|
Date
|
Action
|
Notes
|
|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-01 | Changed | Short description changed. |
| 2005-01-01 | Added | First appearance in code book in 2005. |
Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.